The Stage reports on comments made by Mark Rylance at a conference in which he laid the blame for noisy audiences on the actors:
Yes, there might be occasions when the performances aren't engaging enough but to solely blame actors would absolve playwrights, dramaturgs and directors of any responsibility.
Not all plays are perfect. I've sat through several new works that should have had more development time.
Equally, I've sat through revivals of 'rarely performed' work that probably should have stayed on the bookshelf.
Plays not perfect
Sometimes the actors can be doing their utmost with what isn't a particularly good play. In fact, I've written reviews in which I couldn't fault the production but found the play was lacking.
Not everyone will feel the same way about a particular story and themes and no amount of good acting is going to change it.
I'm not going to get noisy and disruptive when I'm not enjoying a play but others do.
Last week when I was enjoying Julie at the National Theatre the man sat next obviously wasn't. He was huffing and puffing and sighing in that way people do when they are bored or irritated.
Was that the fault of the actors? I don't think so.
Similarly, directors have to take some responsibility. They make choices and they don't always work.
Take a play like Macbeth, there are so many different avenues of creative input, failure of any one of them could make a production fall flat and not fully connect with the audience. It isn't just the acting.
So sorry Mark Rylance but I don't entirely agree.